4.7 Article

Optimization of PLS modeling parameters via quality by design concept for Gardenia jasminoides Ellis using online NIR sensor

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117267

关键词

Quality by design; Partial least-square; On-line; Near-infrared; Chinese material medica

资金

  1. National Key R&D program of China [2018YFC1706900]
  2. Major new drug innovation project of the ministry of science and technology [2018ZX09201011]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773914]
  4. Innovation Team Project of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2019-JYB-TD011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discussed the process parameters optimization of partial least-square (PLS) modeling according to quality by design (QbD) concept. D-optimal design and online near-infrared (NIR) sensor were proposed to analysis the Geniposide in Gardenia jasminoides Ellis using above process parameters to achieve robustness PLS model. Four critical model parameters (CMPs) were identified to construct a D-optimal design, which included the selection of sample set, spectra pre-processing, latent variables and variable selection methods. NIR sensor dataset was obtained under a pilot scale system. The D-optimal design optimization strategy resulted in a robust PLS model with the optimal parameters, 1/2 samples for calibration sets through Baseline spectra pre-processing with SiPLS-selecting variables under 8 factors. The critical evaluation attributes (CEAs) of PLS model were recommended as follows: the RMSEC and R-cal(2) of the calibration set were 0.005901 and 0.9983. The RMSEP and R-pre(2) of the validation set were 0.02002 and 0.9845. The multivariate detection limit (MDL) was 1.143 x 10(-3). Therefore, design space of CMPs which affected CEAs of PLS model was established. The result demonstrated that the proposed method was beneficial for the robustness of PLS model, which also showed a significant guideline for the design and development of PLS model. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据