4.5 Review

Interstellar Dust in the Solar System

期刊

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 215, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-019-0607-9

关键词

Dust; ISM; LIC; Meteoroids; Zodiacal dust; Interplanetary medium; Interstellar dust

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [PO 1015/3-1, PO 1015/4-1]
  2. ERC [724908-Habitat OASIS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interstellar dust from the Local Interstellar Cloud was detected unambiguously for the first time in 1992 (Grun et al. in Nature 362:428-430, 1993). Since then, great progress has been made in observing local interstellar dust in the Solar System using a variety of methods that, all together, provide complementary views of the dust particles from our local galactic neighborhood. The complementary methods discussed in this paper are: (1) in situ observations with dust detectors, (2) sample return, (3) observations of dust in the infrared, and (4) detections using spacecraft antennae. We review the current state of the art of local interstellar dust research, with a special focus on the advances made in the last similar to 10 years of interstellar dust research. We introduce this paper with an overview of the definitions of interstellar dust. We describe the dynamics of the dust particles moving through the heliosphere and report on the progress made in the modelling efforts especially in the last decade. We also review the currently available in situ measurements of interstellar dust flux, speed, direction and size distribution from various missions, in specific from Ulysses and Cassini, and their interpretation in context of the dust dynamics studies. Interstellar dust composition is also reviewed from Cassini in situ time of flight measurements and from the Stardust sample return mission that both took place in the last decade. Finally, also new dust measurements from spacecraft antennae are reviewed. The paper concludes with a discussion on currently still open questions, and an outlook for the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据