4.8 Article

A ratiometric electrochemiluminescence detection for cancer cells using g-C3N4 nanosheets and Ag-PAMAM-luminol nanocomposites

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 76-82

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.08.057

关键词

Electrochemiluminescence; Ratiometric; Biosensor; G-C3N4; Luminol; HL-60 cancer cells

资金

  1. 973 Program [2012CB932600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475058, 21535003]
  3. Science and Technology Support Project of Jiangsu Province, China [BE2013073]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a dual-signaling electrochemiluminescence (ECL) ratiometric sensing approach for the detection of HL-60 cancer cells was reported for the first time. G-C3N4 nanosheets and Ag-PAMAMluminol nanocomposits (Ag-PAMAM-Iuminol NCs) were prepared and served as reductive-oxidative and oxidative-reductive ECL emitters respectively. DNA probe functionalized Ag-PAMAM-Iuminol NCs would hybridize with aptamers modified onto magnetic beads. In the presence of HL-60 cells, the aptamer would conjugate with the target cell and release Ag-PAMAM-Iuminol NCs. After magnetic separation, released Ag-PAIVIAM-Iuminol NCs would hybridize with capture DNA on g-C3N4 nanosheets. ECL from g-C3N4 nanosheets coated on ITO electrode at -1.25 V (vs SCE) could be quenched by AgPAMAM-Iuminol NCs due to the resonance energy transfer (RET) from g-C3N4 nanosheets to Ag NPs. Meanwhile, Ag-PAMAM-Iuminol brought the ECL signal of luminol at +0.45 V (vs SCE). Thus, the concentration of HL-60 cancer cells could be quantified by both the quenching of ECL from g-C3N4 nanosheets and the enhancement of ECL from luminol. By measuring the ratio of ECL intensities at two excitation potentials, this approach could achieve sensitive and reliable detection for cancer cells in a wide range from 200 cells/mL to 9000 cells/mL with the detection limit of 150 cells (S/N=3). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据