4.6 Review

A systematic review of the accuracy of sleep wearable devices for estimating sleep onset

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101227

关键词

Sleep; Sleep onset; Insomnia; Power naps; Intensive sleep retraining; Wearable technology; Consumer sleep technology; Polysomnography; Actigraphy; Systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accurate estimation of sleep onset is required for many purposes, including the administration of a behavioural treatment for insomnia called Intensive Sleep Retraining, facilitating power naps, and conducting objective daytime sleepiness tests. Specialised equipment and trained individuals are presently required to administer these applications in the laboratory: a costly and impractical procedure which limits their utility in practice. A wearable device could be used to administer these applications outside the laboratory, increasing accessibility. This systematic review aimed to identify practical wearable devices that accurately estimate sleep onset. The search strategy identified seventy-one articles which compared estimations of sleep onset latency from wearable devices against polysomnography (PSG). Actigraphy devices produced average estimations of sleep onset latency that were often not significantly different from PSG, but there was large inter-individual variability depending on participant characteristics. As expected, electroencephalography-based devices produced more accurate and less variable estimates. Devices that measured behavioural aspects of sleep onset consistently overestimated PSG-determined sleep onset latency, but to a comparatively low degree. This sleep measurement method could be deployed in a simple wearable device to accurately estimate sleep onset and administer Intensive Sleep Retraining, power naps, and objective daytime sleepiness tests outside the laboratory setting. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据