4.8 Article

A single electrochemical biosensor for detecting the activity and inhibition of both protein kinase and alkaline phosphatase based on phosphate ions induced deposition of redox precipitates

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 220-225

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.025

关键词

Protein kinase; Alkaline phosphatase; Electrochemical; Biosensor; Inhibitor

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB744502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575165]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2015JJ1019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinase (PIGS) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are clinically relevant enzymes for a number of diseases. In this work, we developed a new simple electrochemical biosensor for the detection of the activity and inhibition of both PICA and ALP. One common feature of the PICA and ALP catalyzing process is that PICA can hydrolysis adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) and ALP can hydrolysis pyrophosphate, both reactions produce phosphate ions, and the amount of phosphate ion produced is proportional to enzyme activity. Our assay is based on the principle that phosphate ions react with molybdate to form redox molybdophosphate precipitates on the electrode surface, thus generating electrochemical current. The detection limit for PICA and ALP were much lower than existing assays. The biosensor has good specificity and was used to measure drug-stimulated PICA from lysates of HeLa cells. We also evaluated the use of the biosensor as a screening tool for enzyme inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a biosensor capable of detecting the activity of both PICA and ALP. This tool has the potential to simplify PICA and ALP clinical measurement, thereby improving diagnostics of relevant diseases. It also may serve as the basis for a simple screening method for new enzyme inhibitors for disease treatment. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据