4.6 Article

A Multi-Scale Directional Line Detector for Retinal Vessel Segmentation

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19224949

关键词

directional filter bank; image segmentation; multi-scale line detector; vessel segmentation

资金

  1. project MEDiCS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assessment of transformations in the retinal vascular structure has a strong potential in indicating a wide range of underlying ocular pathologies. Correctly identifying the retinal vessel map is a crucial step in disease identification, severity progression assessment, and appropriate treatment. Marking the vessels manually by a human expert is a tedious and time-consuming task, thereby reinforcing the need for automated algorithms capable of quick segmentation of retinal features and any possible anomalies. Techniques based on unsupervised learning methods utilize vessel morphology to classify vessel pixels. This study proposes a directional multi-scale line detector technique for the segmentation of retinal vessels with the prime focus on the tiny vessels that are most difficult to segment out. Constructing a directional line-detector, and using it on images having only the features oriented along the detector's direction, significantly improves the detection accuracy of the algorithm. The finishing step involves a binarization operation, which is again directional in nature, helps in achieving further performance improvements in terms of key performance indicators. The proposed method is observed to obtain a sensitivity of 0.8043, 0.8011, and 0.7974 for the Digital Retinal Images for Vessel Extraction (DRIVE), STructured Analysis of the Retina (STARE), and Child Heart And health Study in England (CHASE_DB1) datasets, respectively. These results, along with other performance enhancements demonstrated by the conducted experimental evaluation, establish the validity and applicability of directional multi-scale line detectors as a competitive framework for retinal image segmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据