4.7 Article

The impact of foliar application of boron nano-chelated fertilizer and boric acid on fruit yield, oil content, and quality attributes in olive (Olea europaea L.)

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108689

关键词

Antioxidant activity; Foliar application; Fatty acid composition; Olea europaea; Table olive; Yield

资金

  1. University of Zanjan
  2. University of Guilan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wide range of Boron-containing compounds is available in the world market, with different formulations and efficiencies. Among these compounds, nano-chelated products are becoming popular, although there is only limited information on their efficiency. Thus, this study considers the effects of boron nano-chelated fertilizer and boric acid foliar sprays on fruit and oil yield in olive cv. 'Zard'. Their quality attributes were studied during the growing seasons of 2017 and 2018. Fertilizers were used at the concentration of 105 (B-1) and 158.8 (B-2) mg boric acid, 200 (nano-B-1) and 300 (nano-B-2) mg nano-chelated boron, corresponding to 180 mg (B-1 and nano-B-1) and 270 mg (B-2 and nano-B-2) pure boron per liter. Spraying with water was considered as the control (B-0). Fruit characteristics were affected mainly by nano treatments and fruit yield efficiency increased by the use of nano-B-2. In spite of the heavy fruit weight and yield, the nano-B-2 caused a lower amount of oil accumulation in fruits. A high oil percentage was achieved by the treatment of boron (B-2) which resulted in a low crop load. Traits such as oil yield, free fatty acids, antioxidant activity and total phenol content were improved by the application of nano-B-2 fertilizer. Fatty acid composition was affected by B-1 foliar application. Generally, the data obtained from this study showed that nano-B-2 could provide beneficial effects on the growth, fruit and oil yield rather than on oil percentage. The main fatty acid composition was influenced more by boric acid treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据