4.8 Article

More random motor activity fluctuations predict incident frailty, disability, and mortality

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 516, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax1977

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [RF1AG059867, RF1AG064312, R01AG048108, R01AG048108-04S1, R01AG017917, R01NS078009, R56AG59732, R01AG47976, R01AG056352]
  2. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship [20150042]
  3. China Postdoctoral Council [P01AG009975]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile healthcare increasingly relies on analytical tools that can extract meaningful information from ambulatory physiological recordings. We tested whether a nonlinear tool of fractal physiology could predict long-term health consequences in a large, elderly cohort. Fractal physiology is an emerging field that aims to study how fractal temporal structures in physiological fluctuations generated by complex physiological networks can provide important information about system adaptability. We assessed fractal temporal correlations in the spontaneous fluctuations of ambulatory motor activity of 1275 older participants at baseline, with a follow-up period of up to 13 years. We found that people with reduced temporal correlations (more random activity fluctuations) at baseline had increased risk of frailty, disability, and all-cause death during follow-up. Specifically, for 1-SD decrease in the temporal activity correlations of this studied cohort, the risk of frailty increased by 31%, the risk of disability increased by 15 to 25%, and the risk of death increased by 26%. These incidences occurred on average 4.7 years (frailty), 3 to 4.2 years (disability), and 5.8 years (death) after baseline. These observations were independent of age, sex, education, chronic health conditions, depressive symptoms, cognition, motor function, and total daily activity. The temporal structures in dailymotor activity fluctuations may contain unique prognostic information regarding wellness and health in the elderly population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据