4.7 Article

Removal of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution by activated sludge: Mechanism and characteristics

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 711, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135155

关键词

Silver nanoparticles; Activated sludge; Adsorption isotherms; Thermodynamics; Influencing factors

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2016MS0209, 2017MS(LH)0212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing production and use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have attracted more and more attention due to their environmental and health risks. Municipal sewage biological treatment unit has been playing an important role in the removal of AgNPs. This study investigated the mechanism and characteristics of AgNPs and their removal from aqueous solution by activated sludge. Results from Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (SEM/EDS) showed that mixed AgNPs were immobilized by activated sludge. It was shown by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that the fixed AgNPs had an oxidation state of +1. It was inferred by fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectra that AgNPs were adsorbed by activated sludge via binding with its primary amino (R-NH2) radical groups on the surface. These results revealed that the major mechanism for the removal of AgNPs by activated sludge was adsorption. The experiment data were in agreement with the Langmuir and Redlich-Peterson isotherms. The maximum adsorption capacity ranged from 12-32 mg g (1) at temperatures of 10-30 degrees C. Thermodynamic experiment showed that the adsorption of AgNPs by activated sludge was a spontaneous and endothermic reaction. The adsorption kinetics data were in good agreement with the pseudo-secondorder model. The factor results indicated that the adsorption of AgNPs onto activated sludge was influenced by electrostatic repulsion, agglomeration, and the process of oxidation and sulfurization. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据