4.7 Article

Diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) emission to indoor air and transfer to house dust from a PVC sheet

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 711, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134573

关键词

DEHP; Emission; Transfer; Particle; Adsorption; Ingestion

资金

  1. KAKENHI from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan [16H04468]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04468] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) emission to air and transfer to house dust from a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheet were quantified for periods of 1, 3, 7, and 14 days using a passive flux sampler (PFS). Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) test powders class 15 was used as the test house dust in settled weights of 0.3, 1, 3, and 12 mg/cm(2). DEHP concentrations in the surface air on the PVC sheet were estimated as 2.6-3.3 mu g/m(3) according to an emission test without dust. Although DEHP transfer rates from the PVC sheet to the house dust decreased over time, the adsorption did not reach an equilibrium state within 14 days. The transfer rates per dust weight increased with decreasing dust weight on the PVC sheet. The transfer rates per PVC sheet area increased nonlinearly with increasing dust weight on the PVC sheet. DEHP emission from a PVC sheet to air was one to three orders of magnitude lower than DEHP transfer from a PVC sheet to dust. In the case of 0.3 mg/cm(2) of settled house dust for 7 days, the emission rates to air were 35, 15, 9.1, 6.4, and 3.8 mu g/m(2)/h for a diffusion distance of 0.90, 1.85, 2.75, 3.80, and 5.75 mm, respectively, and the transfer rate to dust was 5.3 x 10(2) mu g/m(2)/h (no difference among the five diffusion distances). Compared to residents who clean the floor every day, exposure to DEHP in house dust could be 10 times higher for residents who clean the floor once every two weeks based on the time-weighted average concentrations in house dust. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据