4.7 Article

Understanding the effect of Ca and Mg ions from wastes in the solvent regeneration stage of a biogas upgrading unit

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 691, 期 -, 页码 93-100

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.135

关键词

Carbon capture and utilization; Biogas upgrading; Aqueous carbonation; Waste utilization; Sustainable development

资金

  1. EMASESA through NURECCO2 project
  2. Corporacion Tecnologica de Andalucia (CTA)
  3. University of Seville through V PPIT-US
  4. EPSRC [EP/R512904/1]
  5. Royal Society [RSGR1180353]
  6. CO2Chem UK through the EPSRC [EP/P026435/1]
  7. EPSRC [EP/P026435/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reveals the effect of calcium and magnesium ions in carbonation experiments carried out to regenerate sodium hydroxide from a biogas upgrading unit. This novel study arises as an alternative to standard physical process whose elevated energy consumption imposes economic restrictions. Previous works employed alkaline waste to turn them into value added product. Nevertheless, no attractive economical results were obtained due to the low regeneration efficiencies. Our hypothesis is that both calcium and magnesium waste composition percentages have an impact in the result, hence this work propose an isolated study aiming to determine the of each one in the global performance. To this end, the operational parameters (reaction time, reaction temperature and molar ratio) were tuned as well as physicochemical properties of the final solid samples were analyzed by several techniques. The results indicate that calcium is much more prone than magnesium to reach high efficiencies in aqueous carbonation experiments. Additionally, higher quality products were achieved with calcium. The results of this study suppose an important step for understanding the aqueous carbonation through waste in the path to achieve a more sustainable city and society. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据