4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Bacterial removal performance and community changes during advanced treatment process: A case study at a full-scale water reclamation plant

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 705, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135811

关键词

Reclaimed water; Full-scale; Advanced treatment; Log credit value; Bacterial community

资金

  1. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51738005]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0406300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced treatment is of great significance to water reclamation and reuse, which can improve water quality, control microbial risks and guarantee the safety of water reuse. This study evaluates the microbial quantity and bacterial community dynamics during advanced wastewater treatment and reuse processes (i.e. deni trification biofilter (DNBF), ultrafiltration (UF), ozonation, ultraviolet (UV) disinfection) at a large-scale water reclamation plant. It is found that different treatment processes had significant influence on the cultivability of total bacteria and the log reduction values of fecal coliform at DNBF, UF, ozonation and UV are calculated as 0.38, 2.46,0.38 and 1.63 respectively. Moreover, the bacterial diversity in the treatment process showed apparent spatial differences, among which the effluent from ozonation process had the lowest bacterial diversity. Sequencing analysis indicated the existence of pathogenic bacterium such as Arcobacter, Bacteroides and Pseudomonas in the secondary effluent. Notably, Pseudomonas remained the most dominant species (relative abundance 41.9% in UV effluent) in reclaimed water after advanced treatment processes, which calls for high attention to sustainable water reuse. In order to inhibit bacterial regrowth in the storage tank, chlorine disinfection is recommended to improve the continuous disinfection capability of the system. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据