4.7 Article

Water managements limit heavy metal accumulation in rice: Dual effects of iron-plaque formation and microbial communities

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 687, 期 -, 页码 790-799

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.044

关键词

Metal-contaminated soil; Water management; Iron plaque; Rhizosphere; Iron-reducing bacteria; rice grains

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877138, 41807145]
  2. National Science Foundation for Postdoctoral Scientists of China [2018M642993]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the mechanisms on howwater management canminimize the concentrations of heavymetals in rice grains is important. Twowatermanagementswere concerned in our studies, including continuously flooding and alternatewetting and drying (AWD). Compared to AWD, a continuously flooded culture reduces the concentration of cadmiumand other metals in the rice grains by reducing the root-to-shoot translocation and the availability ofmetals in rhizosphere. In a flooded environment, the rice rhizospherewas characterized by an increased soil pH, reduced fluorescein diacetate (FDA) activity, and lower metal bioavailability. In addition, flooding significantly decreased the iron plaque on the root surface and reduced the affinity for metals in rhizosphere. Water managements significantly changed soil microbial diversity, especially the proportion of anaerobic bacteria, including the iron-reducing bacteria Latescibacteria, Desulfuromonadales, and Geobacteraceae. Interestingly, these bacteria exhibited a significant correlation with cadmium that was adsorbed on the root. This study revealed that continuously flooded culture is a valuable strategy for minimizing heavy metal accumulation in rice grains. By increasing the abundance of unique bacterial community, iron plaque formation and the affinity of metals in rhizospherewere reduced, and the uptake and accumulation of heavymetals in rice plantswas finallymitigated. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据