4.7 Article

Microplastics alter feeding selectivity and faecal density in the copepod, Calanus helgolandicus

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 687, 期 -, 页码 780-789

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.009

关键词

Plastic; Zooplankton; Faecal pellet; Sinking; Marine pollution; Biological carbon pump

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council GW4+ PhD studentship [NE/L002434/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L003988/1, NE/L007010]
  3. NERC [pml010003, NE/L003988/1, NE/L003279/1, pml010004] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics (1 mu m-5 mm) are a ubiquitous marine contaminant of global concern, ingested by a wide range of marine taxa. Copepods are a key component of marine food webs, providing a source of food for higher trophic levels, and playing an important role in marine nutrient cycling. Microplastic ingestion has been documented in copepods, but knowledge gaps remain over how this affects feeding preference and faecal density. Here, we use exposure studies incorporating algal prey and microplastics of varying sizes and shapes at a concentration of 100 microplastics mL(-1) to show: (1) prey selection by the copepod Calanus helgolandicuswas affectedby the size and shape of microplastics and algae they were exposed to; Exposure to nylon fibres resulted in a 6% decrease in ingestion of similar shaped chain-forming algae, whilst exposure to nylon fragments led to an 8% decrease in ingestion of a unicellular algae that were similar in shape and size. (2) Ingestion of microplastics with different densities altered the sinking rates of faecal pellets. Faeces containing low-density polyethylene sank significantly more slowly than controls, whilst sinking rates increasedwhen faeces contained high-density polyethylene terephthalate. These results suggest that C. helgolandicus avoid ingesting algae that are similar in size and/or shape to the microplastic particles they are exposed to, potentially in a bid to avoid consuming the plastic. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据