4.7 Article

Occurrence, fate and environmental risk of anionic surfactants, bisphenol A, perfluorinated compounds and personal care products in sludge stabilization treatments

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 711, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135048

关键词

Endocrine disrupting compounds; Sludge stabilization technologies; Sorption; Biodegradation; Sludge environmental risks; Sludge-amended soils

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, twenty-three endocrine disrupting compounds have been monitored in sludge from different stages of four sludge stabilization treatments (anaerobic digestion, aerobic digestion, composting and anaerobic stabilization ponds). Their occurrence and fate in sludge stabilization plants and their potential environmental risk in treated sludge and in treated sludge-amended soils have been evaluated. Monitored compounds were six perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFC), four anionic surfactants (sodium alkylsulfates), a plasticiser (bisphenol A (BPA)), four preservatives (parabens), six UV-filters (benzophenones) and two biocides (triclosan and triclocarban). Only two of the UV-filters were not detected in any of the 141 analysed samples. Anionic surfactants (mean concentrations up to 1673 ng/g dry matter (dm) for the sum of surfactants) were the compounds at the highest concentration levels followed by biocides (up to 512 ng/g dm) and UV-filters (up to 662 ng/g dm). The concentrations of anionic surfactants, preservatives and UV-filters decreased 78, 25 and 80%, respectively, after anaerobic digestion. The concentration of perfluorinated carboxylic acids only decreased after composting (80% reduction) whereas biocides and BPA were not affected by any of the studied treatments. Environmental risks (risk quotients > 1) were obtained for all compounds, except for triclocarban and sodium octadecylsulfate, in treated sludge. In treated sludge-amended soils, risk quotients were lower than 1 for all compounds except for triclosan. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据