4.7 Article

Evaluation of miscanthus productivity and water use efficiency in southeastern United States

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 692, 期 -, 页码 1125-1134

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.128

关键词

Miscanthus; Eddy covariance; Evapotranspiration; Water use; Soil carbon

资金

  1. USDA-ARS Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Second generation biofuels, such as perennial grasses, have potential to provide biofuel feedstock while growing on degraded land with minimal inputs. Perennial grasses have been reported to sequester large amounts of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the Midwestern United States (USA). However, there has been little work on biofuel and carbon sequestration potential of perennial grasses in the Southeastern US. Biofuel productivity for dryland Miscanthus x gigantus and irrigated maize in Georgia, USA were quantified using eddy covariance observations of evapotranspiration (ET) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon. Miscanthus biomass yield was 15.54 Mg ha(-1) in 2015 and 11.80 Mg ha(-1) in 2016, while maize produced 30.20 Mg ha(-1) of biomass in 2016. Carbon budgets indicated that both miscanthus and maize fields lost carbon over the experiment. The miscanthus field lost 5 Mg C ha(-1) in both 2015 and 2016 while the maize field lost 1.37 Mg C ha(-1) for the single year of study. Eddy covariance measurement indicated that for 2016 the miscanthus crop evapotranspired 598 mm and harvest water use efficiencies ranged from 6.95 to 13.84 kg C ha(-1) mm(-1). Maize evapotranspired 659 mm with a harvest water use efficiency of 19.12 kg C ha(-1) mm(-1). While biomass yields and gross primary production were relatively high, high ecosystem respiration rates resulted in a loss of ecosystem carbon. Relatively low biomass production, low water use efficiency and high respiration for Miscanthus x gigantus in this experiment suggest that this strain of miscanthus may not be well-suited for dryland production under the environmental conditions found in South Georgia USA. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据