4.7 Article

Volatile organic compound measurements point to fog -induced biomass burning feedback to air quality in the megacity of Delhi

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 689, 期 -, 页码 295-304

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.438

关键词

Volatile organic compounds; Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry; Fog; Biomass burning; Delhi air quality

资金

  1. IISER Mohali Atmospheric Chemistry Facility, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India
  2. Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first ambient measurements of thirteen VOCs fur investigations of emissions and air quality during fog and nun-fog wintertime conditions at a tower site (2E3.57 N, 77.11 E, 220 m amsl) in the megacity of Delhi. Measurements of acetonitrile (biomass burning (BB) tracer), isoprene (biogenic emission tracer in daytime), toluene (a traffic exhaust tracer) and benzene (emitted from BB and traffic), together with soluble and reactive oxygenated VOCs such as methanol, acetone and acetaldehyde were performed during the winters of 2015-16 and 2016-17, using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Remarkably, ambient VOC composition changes during fog were not governed by solubility. Acetaldehyde, toluene, sum of CS-aromatics (e.g. xylenes), sum of C9-aromatics (e.g. trimethyl benzenes) decreased by 30% (>95% confidence interval), whereas acetonitrile and benzene showed significant increases by 20% (>70% confidence interval), even after accounting for boundary layer dilution. During fog, the lower temperatures appeared to induce an emissions feedback from enhanced open BB within Delhi for warming, releasing both gaseous and aerosol pollutants with consequences for fog chemistry, sustenance and intensity. The potential feedback is important to consider for improving current emission parametrizations in models used for predicting air quality and fog in such atmospheric environments. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据