4.7 Article

Assessing the trend of diabetes mellitus by analyzing metformin as a biomarker in wastewater

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 688, 期 -, 页码 281-287

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.117

关键词

Wastewater analysis; Health biomarker; Oral antidiabetic drug; Prevalence; Consumption; Temporal trend

资金

  1. Open fund by Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3132019149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to International Diabetes Federation estimates, China has the highest rate of diabetes in the world. To monitor the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in near real-time, a first-line medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, metformin, was used. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) was applied to estimate the consumption of metformin in Dalian from 2015 to 2018. Quantification of metformin was undertaken using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and N-methyl-bis (trifluoroacetamide) derivatization prior to GC-MS analysis. The concentrations of metformin in eleven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) ranged from 1.7 mu g/L to 239.0 mu g/L, with an average value of 68.3 mu g/L. For metformin consumption, there was a gradual increase from 12.1 mg/d/capita in 2015 to 28.4 mg/d/capita in 2018. Meanwhile, the prevalence of metformin in the Dalian population ranged from 1.6% in 2015 to 3.8% in 2018. Similarly, the prevalence of DM showed an increasing trend from 12.2% in 2015 to 21.6% in 2018, which is consistent with the data predicted by traditional surveys (15.2-19.8%). Additionally, the prevalence of DM in 2015 estimated based on WBE was 12.2%, which agreed with the results from the traditional survey (12.3%). These results indicated that the proposed method provided a feasible way to reveal the prevalence of DM through metformin monitoring by the WBE approach. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据