4.7 Article

Electrochemical degradation of sunscreen agent benzophenone-3 and its metabolite by Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode: Kinetics, mechanism, toxicity and energy consumption

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 688, 期 -, 页码 75-82

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.197

关键词

Benzophenone-3 and metabolite; Electrochemical degradation; Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode; Mechanism and toxicity

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625801]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M643671]
  3. Guangdong Innovation Team Project for Colleges and Universities [2016KCXTD023]
  4. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical degradation of sunscreen agent benzophenone-3 (BP-3) and its metabolite 4-hydroxybenzophenone (4-OH-BP) was investigated by using a Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode. Results showed that the degradation of BP-3 and 4-OH-BP followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, and the rate constants were 0.083 and 0.113 min(-1) at a current density of 25 mA cm(-2), respectively. The electrochemical degradation of BP-3 and 4-OH-BP was efficient over a wide range of pH values, and the degradation was obviously accelerated in the presence of Cl-. Degradation intermediates were identified during the electrochemical process, and the degradation pathways, mainly including hydroxylation, carbonyl group broken from aromatic ring, benzene ring opening and carboxylation, were proposed. Quantitative structure-activity relationship model indicated that the potential risks of BP-3 and 4-OH-BP to fish, daphnia and green algae were decreased with the increase of reaction time. The energy consumption for the degradation of 90% BP-3 and 4-OH-BP was 3.3-62.1 and 3.6-79.5 Wh L-1, respectively. The results illustrate that the electrochemical technique with Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode is expected to be an effective way for removing BP-3 and its metabolite 4-OH-BP from wastewater. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据