4.8 Article

Enzyme assays using sensor arrays based on ion-selective carbon nanotube field-effect transistors

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 7-14

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.04.077

关键词

Electrolyte-gated CNT-FET; Array; Enzyme-substrate interactions; Ion-selective CNT-FET; Urea

资金

  1. International Graduate School for Science and Engineering (IGSSE)
  2. European Integrated Training Networks OrgBio
  3. Graduate School (TUM-GS) at the Technische Universitat Munchen
  4. National Science Centre (NCN, Poland) [DEC-2013/09/B/ST4/00098, 2015/15/B/ST4/04909]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the fields of clinical diagnostics and point-of-care diagnosis as well as food and environmental monitoring there is a high demand for reliable high-throughput, rapid and highly sensitive assays for a simultaneous detection of several analytes in complex and low-volume samples. Sensor platforms based on solution-processable electrolyte-gated carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNT-FETs) are a simple and cost-effective alternative for conventional assays. In this work we demonstrate a selective as well as direct detection of the products of an enzyme-substrate interaction, here the for metabolic processes important urea-urease system, with sensors based on spray-coated CNT-FETs. The selective and direct detection is achieved by immobilizing the enzyme urease via certain surface functionalization techniques on the sensor surface and further modifying the active interfaces with polymeric ion-selective membranes as well as pH-sensitive layers. Thereby, we can avoid the generally applied approach for a field-effect based detection of enzyme reactions via detecting changes in the pH value due to an on-going enzymatic reaction and directly detect selectively the products of the enzymatic conversion. Thus, we can realize a buffering-capacity independent monitoring of changes in the substrate concentration. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据