4.8 Article

Sensitive biomolecule detection in lateral flow assay with a portable temperature-humidity control device

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 98-107

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.005

关键词

LFA; POC; Nucleic acid hybridization; Antigen-antibody interaction; Temperature; RH; Portable temperature-humidity control device

资金

  1. Major International Joint Research Program of China [11120101002]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFG02930]
  3. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Government of Malaysia [UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/44]
  4. China Young 1000-Talent Program
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0437]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lateral flow assays (LFAs) have currently attracted broad interest for point-of-care (POC) diagnostics, but their application has been restricted by poor quantification and limited sensitivity. While the former has been currently solved to some extent by the development of handheld or smartphone-based readers, the latter has not been addressed fully, particularly the potential influences of environmental conditions (e.g., temperature and relative humidity (RH)), which have not yet received serious attention. The present study reports the use of a portable temperature-humidity control device to provide an optimum environmental requirement for sensitivity improvement in LFAs, followed by quantification by using a smartphone. We found that a RH beyond 60% with temperatures of 55-60 degrees C and 37-40 degrees C produced optimum nucleic acid hybridization and antigen-antibody interaction in LFAs, respectively representing a 10-fold and 3-fold signal enhancement over ambient conditions (25 degrees C, 60% RH). We envision that in the future the portable device could be coupled with a fully integrated paper-based sample-to-answer biosensor for sensitive detection of various target analytes in POC settings. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据