4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Collision Detection on Industrial Robots in Repetitive Tasks Using Modified Dynamic Time Warping

期刊

ROBOTICA
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 1717-1736

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0263574719001425

关键词

Collision detection; Industrial robot; Modified dynamic time warping; Human-robot interaction; Elastic similarity measures

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of education, science, and technological development, Republic of Serbia [TR35003]
  2. DIH2 project from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [824964]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [824964] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a non-model-based collision detection algorithm for robots without external sensors and with closed control architecture. A reference signal of repetitive motion is recorded from the robot operation. To detect collisions, the reference is compared with measurements from the robot. One of the key contributions is a novel approach to optimal matching of compared signals, which is ensured by the newly developed modified Dynamic Time Warping (mDTW) method presented in this paper. One of the main improvements of the mDTW is that it enables comparing a signal with the most similar section of the other signal. Partial matching also enables online application of time warping principles and reduces the time and computation resources needed to perform matching. In addition to mDTW, two complementary decision rules are developed to identify collisions. The first rule, based on the absolute difference between compared matched samples, uses statistically determined thresholds to perform rapid detection of unambiguous collisions. The second rule is based on Eigen values of the covariance matrix of matched samples, and it employs its higher sensitivity to detect collisions with lower intensity. Results from experimental validation of the proposed collision algorithm on two industrial robots are shown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据