4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Preparation of coffee-shell activated carbon and its application for water vapor adsorption

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 11-19

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.097

关键词

Coffee-shell activated carbon; Activation temperature; Activation time; Mass ratio; Water vapor adsorption; Pore development

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51566017]
  2. Yunnan Province Education Department Scientific Research Foundation Project [2018Y036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coffee-shell activated carbon was prepared by a two-step activation method including carbonization process and potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation process. The influences of activation temperature, activation time and mass ratio of KOH to char on activated carbon water vapor adsorption performance were investigated by single factor design. The optimum preparation conditions of activated carbon with large adsorption capacity were determined. The water vapor adsorption experiments of activated carbon were carried out under 70% relative humidity and adsorption temperature of 298 K. Pore structure characteristics were studied via N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherm. The results show that the optimum preparation conditions are activation temperature of 1073 K, activation time of 10 min and mass ratio of KOH to char of 3:1. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area, total pore volume and water vapor adsorption capacity of the optimum coffee-shell activated carbon are 2349 m(2)/g, 1.036 cm(3)/g and 0.7409 g/g, respectively. All isotherms are type I with narrow pore size distributions in micropore region. Moreover, the obtained activated carbon was characterized by pH, elemental analysis and Fourier transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The results show that the obtained activated carbon would be one of the potential adsorbents for dehumidification in solar energy drying system. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据