4.7 Article

A role for 5-HT4 receptors in human learning and memory

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 50, 期 16, 页码 2722-2730

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719002836

关键词

Antidepressant; cognition; healthy volunteers; 5-HT4 receptor; memory; prucalopride

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/K022202/1]
  2. NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
  3. MRC [MR/P012604/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. 5-HT4 receptor stimulation has pro-cognitive and antidepressant-like effects in animal experimental studies; however, this pharmacological approach has not yet been tested in humans. Here we used the 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist prucalopride to assess the translatability of these effects and characterise, for the first time, the consequences of 5-HT4 receptor activation on human cognition and emotion. Methods. Forty one healthy volunteers were randomised, double-blind, to a single dose of prucalopride (1 mg) or placebo in a parallel group design. They completed a battery of cognitive tests measuring learning and memory, emotional processing and reward sensitivity. Results. Prucalopride increased recall of words in a verbal learning task, increased the accuracy of recall and recognition of words in an incidental emotional memory task and increased the probability of choosing a symbol associated with a high likelihood of reward or absence of loss in a probabilistic instrumental learning task. Thus acute prucalopride produced pro-cognitive effects in healthy volunteers across three separate tasks. Conclusions. These findings are a translation of the memory enhancing effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism seen in animal studies, and lend weight to the idea that the 5-HT4 receptor could be an innovative target for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Contrary to the effects reported in animal models, prucalopride did not reveal an antidepressant profile in human measures of emotional processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据