4.3 Article

Template-based modeling by ClusPro in CASP13 and the potential for using co-evolutionary information in docking

期刊

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
卷 87, 期 12, 页码 1241-1248

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25808

关键词

homology modeling; method development; modeling of protein complexes; protein-protein interaction; template-based

资金

  1. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1816314]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R21GM127952, R35GM118078]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1816314] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a participant in the joint CASP13-CAPRI46 assessment, the ClusPro server debuted its new template-based modeling functionality. The addition of this feature, called ClusPro TBM, was motivated by the previous CASP-CAPRI assessments and by the proven ability of template-based methods to produce higher-quality models, provided templates are available. In prior assessments, ClusPro submissions consisted of models that were produced via free docking of pre-generated homology models. This method was successful in terms of the number of acceptable predictions across targets; however, analysis of results showed that purely template-based methods produced a substantially higher number of medium-quality models for targets for which there were good templates available. The addition of template-based modeling has expanded ClusPro's ability to produce higher accuracy predictions, primarily for homomeric but also for some heteromeric targets. Here we review the newest additions to the ClusPro web server and discuss examples of CASP-CAPRI targets that continue to drive further development. We also describe ongoing work not yet implemented in the server. This includes the development of methods to improve template-based models and the use of co-evolutionary information for data-assisted free docking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据