4.6 Article

Phyto-fabricated ZnO nanoparticles from Canthium dicoccum (L.) for antimicrobial, anti-tuberculosis and antioxidant activity

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 220-226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.10.020

关键词

Antimicrobial; Anti-tuberculosis; DPPH; Canthium dicoccum; Live and dead; Zinc oxide nanoparticles

资金

  1. University of Mysore [ViGA: 04/11/2015-16]
  2. ICMR, New Delhi [45/69/2018PHA/BMS/OL]
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India through DST - INSPIRE fellowship [IF160104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioactivity exhibited by nanoparticles has been interesting for researchers globally. The phytogenic synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) has been an eco-friendly approach due to its low toxicity and biological potential. In this pretext, the present study has been conducted. The bacterial inhibition by ZnO-NPs could be attributed to its high specific surface charge and reactive oxygen species generation. The present study states the phyto-fabrication of ZnO-NPs employing aqueous leaf extract of Canthium dicoccum (L.). The synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) displayed characteristic excitation at 293 nm. The dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis revealed an average 33 nm size of ZnO-NPs. The FT-IR functional groups C-H stretch, C-H bend, aromatic C-N stretch, and C-O stretch were observed in phyto-fabricated ZnO-NPs. Results obtained from antibacterial activities inferred that ZnO-NPs were most effective against Bacillus subtilis, least sensitive to Staphylococcus aureus. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was observed in the range 78.12 to 625 mu g mL(-1) which was further confirmed by bacterial cell viability test. The Anti-TB activity by Alamar Blue Dye test revealed phytofabricated ZnO-NPs inhibited M. tuberculosis at 25 mu g mL(-1). The result of the antioxidant activity of the DPPH method was dose-dependent. The application of ZnO-NPs as potential antibacterial applications could be envisioned.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据