4.8 Article

Effective concentrations enforced by intrinsically disordered linkers are governed by polymer physics

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904813116

关键词

effective concentration; intrinsically disordered protein; flexible linker; polymer physics; fluorescent biosensor

资金

  1. Young Investigator Program of the Villum Foundation
  2. AIAS COFUND program - EU FP7 Cofund programme [754513]
  3. PROMEMO - Center for Proteins in Memory, a Center of Excellence - Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many multidomain proteins contain disordered linkers that regulate interdomain contacts, and thus the effective concentrations that govern intramolecular reactions. Effective concentrations are rarely measured experimentally, and therefore little is known about how they relate to linker architecture. We have directly measured the effective concentrations enforced by disordered protein linkers using a fluorescent biosensor. We show that effective concentrations follow simple geometric models based on polymer physics, offering an indirect method to probe the structural properties of the linker. The compaction of the disordered linker depends not only on net charge, but also on the type of charged residues. In contrast to theoretical predictions, we found that polyampholyte linkers can contract to similar dimensions as globular proteins. Hydrophobicity has little effect in itself, but aromatic residues lead to strong compaction, likely through p-interactions. Finally, we find that the individual contributors to chain compaction are not additive. We thus demonstrate that direct measurement of effective concentrations can be used in systematic studies of the relationship between sequence and structure of intrinsically disordered proteins. A quantitative understanding of the relationship between effective concentration and linker sequence will be crucial for understanding disorder-based allosteric regulation in multidomain proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据