4.7 Article

High-performance porous PLLA-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation

期刊

POLYMER
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121707

关键词

PLLA-based scaffolds; Structural manipulation; Sc-CO2 foaming; Degradability; Hydrophilicity; In vitro and in vivo

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51803062, 51573063]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030310379]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904010272]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA)-based tissue engineering scaffolds have gained growing interests due to their unique structures and properties. However, the simple and green fabrication of PLLA-based scaffolds with uniform and interconnected pore structure, good degradability and hydrophobicity, and excellent biocompatibility remain a major challenge. Herein, we developed a facile, cost-effective and eco-friendly structural manipulation processing with supercritical carbon dioxide (Sc-CO2) foaming technique to prepare porous PLLA/poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) (95/5 wt%) scaffolds. First, structural manipulation processing was used to manipulate the formation of oriented crystal structure in a PLLA matrix, which could slow down the gas escaping during the Sc-CO2 foaming process. Subsequently, the Sc-CO2 foaming process was utilized to form 3D porous scaffolds, which are suitable for the cell growth, migration and proliferation. The fabricated porous biodegradable scaffold exhibited high porosity (90.3%), uniform and interconnected open-pores, good strengths (11.9 MPa/(g.cm(3))), degradabilities and hydrophilicities (75.7 +/- 2.1 degrees), as well as excellent in vitro biocompatibilities. For in vivo application, a rabbit model with bone defects was utilized, and both the histological analysis and immunohistochemical analysis results revealed that the obtained porous PLLA/PEG scaffolds support bone tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据