4.7 Article

Highly interconnected macroporous structures made from starch nanoparticle-stabilized medium internal phase emulsion polymerization for use in cell culture

期刊

POLYMER
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121744

关键词

Macroporous structure; PolyMIPPE; Starch nanoparticle; Pickering emulsion; Scaffold; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS) [G2015IASBS32632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly interconnected uniform pore structure was prepared through polymerization of medium internal phase Pickering emulsion, called polyMIPPE, are reported. Citric acid crosslinked starch nanoparticle (CSTN) with particle size of 50 nm, as an amphiphilic pH-sensitive particulate stabilizer, was used to prepare stable sunflower oil-in-water emulsions. The polyMIPPEs were obtained through the copolymerization of acrylamide (AM) with N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAA) in the continuous phase followed by extraction of internal phase. The effect of main parameters such as pH, CSTN and AM content on the size and size distribution of the emulsion droplets as well as the pore size and interconnectivity of the related polyMIPPEs were investigated. Results showed that the best interconnected pore structure (with a pore size of 6.2 mu m, pore throat size of 2.0 mu m, pore volume of 61% and porosity of 80%) was obtained for the sample included 0.7 wt% of CSTN, 3.75M of AM, AM/MBAA molar ratio of 9.14 and oil volume fraction of 62.5%. It was concluded that the employed force caused by volume contraction during the polymerization is high enough to tear films between the pores to create large pore throats, namely higher interconnectivity. Preliminary cell culture and biocompatibility assessments with human neuroblastoma cells indicated that the prepared porous materials have no significant detrimental effect on cell adhesion. It is believed that these materials could be presented as a promising culture substrates for various biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据