4.8 Article

The Evening Complex Establishes Repressive Chromatin Domains Via H2A.Z Deposition

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 182, 期 1, 页码 612-625

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00881

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea's Basic Science Research programs [NRF-2019R1A2C2006915]
  2. Rural Development Administration's Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program [PJ01314501]
  3. Federacion Espanola de Enfermedades Raras/Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  4. Ramon Areces Foundation
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (Agency for Management of University and Research Grants)
  6. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya Program/Generalitat de Catalunya
  7. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Severo Ochoa Program for Centers of Excellence in RD 2016-2019 [2015-0533]
  8. Gatsby Foundation [GAT3273/GLB]
  9. [NRF-2017R1A4A1015620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Evening Complex (EC) is a core component of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) circadian clock, which represses target gene expression at the end of the day and integrates temperature information to coordinate environmental and endogenous signals. Here we show that the EC induces repressive chromatin structure to regulate the evening transcriptome. The EC component ELF3 directly interacts with a protein from the SWI2/SNF2-RELATED (SWR1) complex to control deposition of H2A.Z-nucleosomes at the EC target genes. SWR1 components display circadian oscillation in gene expression with a peak at dusk. In turn, SWR1 is required for the circadian clockwork, as defects in SWR1 activity alter morning-expressed genes. The EC-SWR1 complex binds to the loci of the core clock genes PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 (PRR7) and PRR9 and catalyzes deposition of nucleosomes containing the histone variant H2A.Z coincident with the repression of these genes at dusk. This provides a mechanism by which the circadian clock temporally establishes repressive chromatin domains to shape oscillatory gene expression around dusk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据