4.2 Article

Inhibition of TRPA1 and IL-6 Signal Alleviates Neuropathic Pain Following Chemotherapeutic Bortezomib

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 845-855

出版社

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST PHYSIOLOGY
DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934015

关键词

Bortezomib; Chemotherapeutics; TRPA1; Neuro-inflammation; Peripheral neuropathy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bortezomib (BTZ) is used as a chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Nevertheless, one of the significant limiting complications of BTZ is painful peripheral neuropathy during BTZ therapy. Thus, in this study we examined signaling pathways of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in the sensory nerves responsible for neuropathic pain induced by BTZ and further determined if influencing the pathways can improve neuropathic pain. ELISA and western blot analysis were used to examine the levels of IL-6, and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), TRPA1 and p38-MAPK and JNK signal in the lumbar dorsal root ganglion. Behavioral test was performed to determine mechanical and cold sensitivity in a rat model. Our results showed that systemic injection of BTZ increased mechanical pain and cold sensitivity as compared with control animals. Data also showed that protein expression of TRPA1 and IL-6R was upregulated in the dorsal root ganglion of BTZ rats and blocking TRPA1 attenuated mechanical and cold sensitivity in control rats and BTZ rats. Notably, the inhibitory effect of blocking TRPA1 was smaller in BTZ rats than that in control rats. In addition, a blockade of IL-6 signal attenuated intracellular p38-MAPK and JNK in the sensory neuron. This also decreased TRPA1 expression and alleviated mechanical hyperalgesia and cold hypersensitivity in BTZ rats. In conclusion, we revealed specific signaling pathways leading to neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapeutic BTZ, including IL-6-TRPA1, suggesting that blocking these signals is beneficial to alleviate neuropathic pain during BTZ intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据