4.8 Article

Role of extracellular polymeric substances in enhancement of phosphorus release from waste activated sludge by rhamnolipid addition

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 59-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.086

关键词

Extracellular polymeric substances; Phosphorus release; Waste activated sludge; Rhamnolipid; Species

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51225802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51578534]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2014ZX07204-005]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Project 135 of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YSW2013B06]
  6. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-EW-STS-102]
  7. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [QAK201405]
  8. International S&T Cooperation Program [S2015GR1012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in enhanced performance of phosphorus (P) release from waste activated sludge (WAS) by adding rhamnolipid (RL). Results showed that compared to WAS without pretreatment, the released PO43 -P increased with RL addition from 0 to 0.2 g/g TSS (total suspended solid), and increased by 208% under the optimal condition (0.1 g RL/g TSS and 72-h fermentation time). The cumulative PO43 -P was better fitted with pseudo-first-order kinetic model. Moreover, the contents of metal ions increased in liquid but decreased in EPSs linearly with RL addition increasing, and WAS solubilizations were positively correlated with the released metal ions. The enhanced total dissolved P mainly came from cells and others (69.39%, 2.27-fold higher than that from EPSs), and PO43 -P was the main species in both liquid and loosely bound EPSs, but organic P should be non-negligible in tightly bound EPSs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据