4.8 Article

Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 50-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.087

关键词

Osmotic membrane bioreactor; Cellulose triacetate; Thin-film composite; Forward osmosis; Biofouling

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2012ZX07503-002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21107035, 51578265]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are two types of popular forward osmosis (FO) membrane materials applied for researches on FO process, cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin film composite (TFC) polyamide. However, performance and fouling mechanisms of commercial TFC FO membrane in osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBRs) are still unknown. In current study, its biofouling behaviors in OMBRs were investigated and further compared to the CTA FO membrane. The results indicated that beta-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides and microorganisms accounted for approximately 77% of total biovolume on the CTA FO membrane while beta-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides (biovolume ratio of 81.1%) were the only dominant biofoulants on the TFC FO membrane. The analyses on the biofouling structure implied that a tighter biofouling layer with a larger biovolume was formed on the CTA FO membrane. The differences in biofouling behaviors including biofoulants composition and biofouling structure between CTA and TFC FO membranes were attributed to different membrane surface properties. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据