4.4 Article

Tumor-Infiltrating CD1a+ DCs and CD8+/FoxP3+ Ratios Served as Predictors for Clinical Outcomes in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

期刊

PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1687-1695

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00701-5

关键词

Tongue squamous cell carcinoma; Tumor infiltrating immune cell; Clinical outcome; Diagnostic value

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772880, 81702680]
  2. Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation [YKK16164, QRX17083]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline
  4. Nanjing Municipal Key Medical Laboratory Constructional Project Fund
  5. Center of Nanjing Clinical Medicine of tumor project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells engage in an extensive crosstalk with tumors and act as two-edged swords by inhibiting or promoting cancer growth. Therefore, identifying the density and prognostic values of tumor-infiltrating immune cells will provide valuable tips for cancer treatments. In this study, we identified the density of tumor inflammatory infiltrates and the number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, including CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), FoxP3(+) T cells and CD1a(+) dendritic cells (DCs) in 153 tongue squamous cell carcinomas (TSCC). High inflammatory cell infiltration was associated with better overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). Moreover, the number of CD3(+), CD4(+), FoxP3(+) and CD1a(+) cells were associated with tumor differentiation (P<0.001) and the number of FoxP3(+), CD1a(+) cells and CD8(+)/FoxP3(+) ratios were also associated with tumor stage (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.05). In addition, patients with higher CD1a(+) DCs had better OS and increased CD8(+)/FoxP3(+) ratios were associated with improved OS and DFS (P = 0.037; P = 0.047; P = 0.033). In conclusion, our results indicated that tumor-infiltrating CD1a(+) DCs and CD8(+)/FoxP3(+) ratios were associated with favorable clinical outcomes but not independent prognostic factors for TSCC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据