4.4 Article

Autophagy Suppression Accelerates Apoptosis Induced by Norcantharidin in Cholangiocarcinoma

期刊

PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1697-1707

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00719-9

关键词

Autophagy; Norcantharidin; Cholangiocarcinoma; Apoptosis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81670570]
  2. Key research and development program of Jiangsu Province [BE2016789]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Norcantharidin is a cantharidin demethylated analog with antitumor effects in many tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma. Autophagy suppression is known to increase chemosensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma. This study aimed to determine whether autophagy suppression accelerates apoptosis induced by norcantharidin in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. The human cholangiocarcinoma cell line QBC939 was incubated in RPMI 1640 medium with or without norcantharidin. Autophagy was induced using HBSS media with Ca2+ and Mg2+ supported by 10 mM HEPES or suppressed by treatment with 3-MA or transfection with siRNA against Atg5. The comparison was drawn between these conditions in mitochondrial membrane potential disturbance, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptotic proteins, and apoptosis. Cholangiocarcinoma cell apoptosis was accelerated by norcantharidin. Autophagy suppression up-regulated norcantharidin's pro-apoptotic effect, but autophagy induction weakened it. As apoptosis was accelerated, ROS production was up-regulated. Bax protein expression, cytochrome c levels and localization, mitochondrial membrane disturbance, and the levels of caspase-9, caspase-3, and cleaved PARP were higher when autophagy was suppressed, and all of those were down-regulated when autophagy was induced. To sum up, it was found that norcantharidin induced cholangiocarcinoma cell death, and autophagy suppression enhanced the pro-apoptotic action of norcantharidin, which appears to involve the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway activation and ROS generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据