4.5 Article

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: pathology, clinical course and relation to T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

PATHOLOGY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 142-153

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.10.003

关键词

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma; T-cell histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma; transformation; relapses; LP cells; histopathological growth patterns; genetics

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HA6145/3-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an unusual subtype of Hodgkin lymphoma characterised by a distinct histopathological and clinical presentation. It mostly affects males and presents with localised disease and an indolent clinical course in the majority of cases. However, there are also patients with advanced NLPHL who frequently present with spleen and liver involvement, B-symptoms and a more aggressive clinical course. Different clinical presentations correlate with distinct histopathological characteristics. NLPHL can be divided into typical and variant histopathological growth patterns. The clinical course of most patients with a typical growth pattern is indolent whereas patients with a variant histology more often present with advanced stage disease and relapse occurs more frequently and earlier. Despite these differences, the prognosis after stage-adapted treatment is favourable for both patient groups. Some cases presenting with a variant histology show a histopathological and clinical overlap with T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL). Although being considered as aggressive B-cell lymphoma, THRLBCL exhibits many features that are similar to NLPHL, indicating a close relationship with regard to pathogenesis. Both lymphoma entities derive from germinal centre B-cells, show ongoing somatic hypermutation, and resemble each other in terms of gene expression of tumour cells, genomic imbalances and mutation patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据