4.5 Article

Objective impairment of tandem gait in Parkinson's disease patients increases with disease severity

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 33-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.09.023

关键词

Tandem gait; Falls; Parkinson's disease; Freezing of gait

资金

  1. University of Arkansas Clinician Scientist Program
  2. NIGMS IDeA Program Center of Excellence award [P30 GM110702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Tandem gait abnormalities have been reported to increase with advancing age, play a role in fall-prediction in Parkinson's disease, and distinguish it from atypical parkinsonism. Tandem gait has been scored based on the number of side steps off a straight line in these studies. Objective measurement of spatiotemporal tandem gait parameters in Parkinson's disease has not been previously reported. Methods: Subjects (74 Parkinson's disease and 28 controls) were enrolled after IRB approval. Those with more than 1 fall/day or a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 10 were excluded. Subjects tandem walked (heel to toe) on a 20 foot pressure-sensor mat. Data was collected and analyzed using PKMAS software (Protokinetics). Results: Compared to controls, on tandem gait, Parkinson's subjects had increased step width, stride width and path width, with a slower stride velocity and an increased time spent in all phases of the gait cycle. Parkinson's subjects also applied greater pressure with each step and had greater step-to-step variability in tandem gait measures. While Hoehn & Yahr stage 1 subjects were not significantly different from controls, stage 2 and 2.5 + groups were different. Parkinson's subjects with freezing of gait also walked with a wider base compared to those without gait freezing. Tandem gait spatiotemporal parameters were not correlated with fall frequency. Conclusions: Tandem gait is impaired in Parkinson's disease in a stage-dependent manner, with wider base and increased step-to-step variability, which could suggest involvement of cerebellar and mediolateral balance pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据