4.3 Article

Cardiac Rehabilitation Increases SIRT1 Activity and β-Hydroxybutyrate Levels and Decreases Oxidative Stress in Patients with HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7049237

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Medicine and Health Sciences of the University of Molise [R-DIPA_20112013300118CORBI-GR]
  2. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry of the University of Salerno [ORSA153180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. Exercise training induces beneficial effects also by increasing levels of Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (beta OHB). Up to date, no studies investigated the role of exercise training-based cardiac rehabilitation (ET-CR) programs on beta OHB levels. Therefore, the present study is aimed at investigating whether a supervised 4-week ET-CR program was able to induce changes in Sirt1 activity and beta OHB levels and to evaluate the possible relationship between such parameters, in Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) patients. Methods. A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted on patients consecutively admitted to the Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation Units of San Gennaro dei Poveri Hospital in Naples, Italy. In fifty elderly patients affected by HFpEF, in NYHA II and III class, Sirt1 activity, Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), beta OHB, and Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) levels were measured before and at the end of the ET-CR program. A control group of 20 HFpEF patients was also recruited, and the same parameters were evaluated 4 weeks after the beginning of the study. Results. ET-CR induced an increase of Sirt1 activity, beta OHB levels, and antioxidant capacity. Moreover, it was associated with a rise in NAD(+) and NAD(+)/NADH ratio levels and a reduction in Ox-LDL. No changes affected the controls. Conclusion. The characterization of the ET-CR effects from a metabolic viewpoint might represent an important step to improve the HFpEF management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据