4.8 Article

New substituted quinoxalines inhibit triple-negative breast cancer by specifically downregulating the c-MYC transcription

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 20, 页码 10529-10542

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz835

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803348]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030310580]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [JCYJ20170818141916158]
  4. Natural Science Research Project of Shenzhen University [2018019]
  5. Shenzhen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional chemotherapy remains the primary treatment option for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the current chemotherapeutic drugs have limited effects on TNBC, and often lead to serious side effects as well as drug resistance. Thus, more effective therapeutic options are sorely needed. As c-MYC oncogene is highly expressed during TNBC pathogenesis, inhibiting c-MYC expression would be an alternative anti-TNBC strategy. In this study, we designed and synthesized a serial of quinoxaline analogs that target c-MYC promoter G-quadruplex (G4), which is believed to be a repressor of c-MYC transcription. Among them, a difluoro-substituted quinoxaline QN-1 was identified as the most promising G4-stabilizing ligand with high selectivity to c-MYC G4 over other G4s, which is distinguished from many other reported ligands. Intracellular studies indicated that QN-1 induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, repressed metastasis and inhibited TNBC cell growth, primarily due to the downregulation of c-MYC transcription by a G4-dependent mechanism. Notably, inhibition by QN-1 was significantly greater for c-MYC than other G4-driven genes. Cancer cells with c-MYC overexpression were more sensitive to QN-1, relative to normal cells. Furthermore, QN-1 effectively suppressed tumor growth in a TNBC mouse model. Accordingly, this work provides an alternative strategy for treating TNBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据