4.7 Article

Harmonic resonances of graphene-reinforced nonlinear cylindrical shells: effects of spinning motion and thermal environment

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 981-1000

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-019-05297-8

关键词

Cylindrical shells; Harmonic resonances; Graphene nanoplatelets; Spinning; Thermal environment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872319, 11672250]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP160101978]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates nonlinear harmonic resonance behaviors of graded graphene-reinforced composite spinning thin cylindrical shells subjected to a thermal load and an external excitation. The volume fraction of graphene platelets varies continuously in the shell's thickness direction, which generates position-dependent useful material properties. Natural frequencies of shell traveling waves are derived by considering influences of the initial hoop tension, centrifugal and Coriolis forces, thermal expansion deformation, and thermal conductivity. A new Airy stress function is introduced. Harmonic resonance behaviors and their stable solutions for the spinning cylindrical shell are analyzed based on an equation of motion which is established by adopting Donnell's nonlinear shell theory. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the subharmonic resonance of the spinning composite cylindrical shell are given. Besides the shell's intrinsic structural damping, the Coriolis effect due to the spinning motion has a contribution to the damping terms of the system as well. Comparisons between the present analytical results and those in other papers are made to validate the existing solutions. Influences of main factors on vibration characteristics, primary resonance, and subharmonic resonance behaviors of the novel composite cylindrical shell are discussed. Furthermore, the mechanism of how the spinning motion affects the amplitude-frequency curves of harmonic resonances of the cylindrical shell is analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据