4.4 Article

Abnormalities within and beyond the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry in medication-free patients with OCD revealed by the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and resting-state functional connectivity

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 712, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134449

关键词

Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry; Fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; Functional connectivity; Sensory phenomenon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271493]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7122082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroimaging studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often focus on the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuitry, but recent studies have found abnormal spontaneous brain activity in regions outside the CSTC circuitry in patients with OCD using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Researchers have not clearly determined whether changes in spontaneous brain activity within and beyond the CSTC circuitry coexist in medication-free patients with OCD. To address this question, we recruited 64 medication-free patients with OCD and 60 matched healthy controls (HCs) to investigate their spontaneous brain activity by measuring the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) and resting-state functional connectivity. Patients with OCD showed increased fALFF values in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and decreased fALFF values in the right rolandic operculum compared with HCs. Furthermore, patients with OCD exhibited significantly increased functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and the left cerebellum and reduced negative functional connectivity between the right rolandic operculum and the left precuneus. These findings provided new insights into the pathophysiological model of OCD, which may include CSTC circuitry and regions outside this circuitry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据