4.8 Review

Future and challenges for hybrid upconversion nanosystems

期刊

NATURE PHOTONICS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 828-838

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-019-0528-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australia-China Joint Research Centre for Pointof-Care Testing [ACSRF65827, SQ2017YFGH001190]
  2. ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award Scheme [DE180100669]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [KQTD20170810110913065]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61729501, 51720105015]
  5. ARC Centre of Excellence in Exciton Science [CE170100026]
  6. Global Research Laboratory (GRL) Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2016911815]
  7. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE), Korea [10077582]
  8. KRICT [KK1933-10, SKO1930-20]
  9. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10077582] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the efficiency of photon upconversion, a hybrid approach of combining organic dyes and inorganic nanoparticles is proving successful, especially in the form of dye-sensitized lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles, nanoparticle-sensitized molecular triplet-triplet annihilation systems and metal-organic-framework nanoparticles. In this Review, we survey the latest advances and examine the key factors affecting upconversion performance, such as spectral overlap, core-shell design and the management of triplet excitons and quenchers at the interface between materials. Although issues such as stability, triplet-state quenching, concentration quenching and reabsorption must still be overcome, smart designs of hybrid nanosystems offer exciting opportunities for applications such as solar photovoltaic devices, deep-tissue biomedical imaging, optogenetics and nanomedicine among others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据