4.7 Article

Associative conditioning remaps odor representations and modifies inhibition in a higher olfactory brain area

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 1844-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0495-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis Research Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_135196, 310030B_1528331]
  3. HFSPO [LT000278/2012-L]
  4. EMBO [ALTF 994-2010]
  5. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation [742576]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_135196] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [742576] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intelligent behavior involves associations between high-dimensional sensory representations and behaviorally relevant qualities such as valence. Learning of associations involves plasticity of excitatory connectivity, but it remains poorly understood how information flow is reorganized in networks and how inhibition contributes to this process. We trained adult zebrafish in an appetitive odor discrimination task and analyzed odor representations in a specific compartment of the posterior zone of the dorsal telencephalon (Dp), the homolog of mammalian olfactory cortex. Associative conditioning enhanced responses with a preference for the positively conditioned odor. Moreover, conditioning systematically remapped odor representations along an axis in coding space that represented attractiveness (valence). Interindividual variations in this mapping predicted variations in behavioral odor preference. Photoinhibition of interneurons resulted in specific modifications of odor representations that mirrored effects of conditioning and reduced experience-dependent, interindividual variations in odor-valence mapping. These results reveal an individualized odor-to-valence map that is shaped by inhibition and reorganized during learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据