4.8 Article

Single-atom gold oxo-clusters prepared in alkaline solutions catalyse the heterogeneous methanol self-coupling reactions

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 1098-1105

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0345-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE/BES [DE-FG02-05ER15730]
  2. Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. US DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, Propulsion Materials Program
  4. DOE-BES, Office of Chemical Sciences [DE-FG02-05ER15731]
  5. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  6. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC0205CH11231]
  7. UW-Madison, the Advanced Computing Initiative
  8. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  9. Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. US Department of Energy's Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to obtain the maximum atom efficiency, research on heterogeneous single-atom catalysts has intensified recently. Anchoring organometallic homogeneous catalysts to surfaces creates issues with retaining mononuclearity and activity, while the several techniques developed to prepare atomically dispersed precious metals on oxide supports are usually complex. Here we report a facile one-pot synthesis of inorganometallic mononuclear gold complexes formed in alkaline solutions as robust and versatile single-atom gold catalysts. The complexes remain intact on impregnation onto supports or after drying in air to give a crystalline powder. They can be used to interrogate the nuclearity of the catalytically active gold site for reactions known to be catalysed by oxidized gold species. We show that the [Au-1-O-x]- cluster directs the heterogeneous coupling of two methanol molecules to methyl formate and hydrogen with a 100% selectivity below 180 degrees C. The reaction is industrially important as well as the key step in methanol steam reforming on gold catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据