4.0 Article

Xeno-Free Cryopreservation of Bone Marrow-Derived Multipotent Stromal Cells from Callithrix jacchus

期刊

BIOPRESERVATION AND BIOBANKING
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 530-538

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2016.0038

关键词

cryopreservation; serum free; reduced DMSO content; defined cryoprotective medium; multipotent stromal cells

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for the Cluster of Excellence REBIRTH [EXC 62/1]
  2. ZIM (Zentrales Innovationsprogramm Mittelstand) [KF2654703SB3]
  3. Askion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the previous decade, numerous biobanks were established and have created large markets for the storage of bioactive compounds, cells, and tissues for medical and diagnostic applications. For in vivo clinical and therapeutic purposes, it is critical to use well-defined and xeno-free components during cultivation, preservation, and transplantation of biological material. Safe and efficacious storage of bioactive molecules, cells, and tissues, without the addition of undefined medium components, minimizes risks of zoonotic disease transmission and is thus an essential and desirable prerequisite for biobanks. This gives rise to a need for well-characterized and serum-free freezing media for application in cryopreservation. For this purpose, cryobiological additives such as methylcellulose, poloxamer-188, and alpha-tocopherol, which have previously been shown to exhibit a cytoprotective activity, have been investigated for cryoprotection on stem cells. With this strategy, the application of fetal bovine serum(FBS) could be avoided and the concentration of toxic cryoprotective agents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could be reduced. Our results suggest that the viability, as well as the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation capacity of the thawed bone marrow-derived multipotent stromal stem cells, could be maintained using a freezing medium without FBS consisting of methylcellulose, poloxamer, and alpha-tocopherol with only 2.5% DMSO (% v/v).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据