4.5 Article

Increased maize growth and P uptake promoted by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi coincide with higher foliar herbivory and larval biomass of the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

期刊

MYCORRHIZA
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 615-622

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-019-00920-3

关键词

Agroecology; Multitrophic interactions; Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Foliar herbivory; Phosphorus

资金

  1. National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT) [179319]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most plant species naturally associate with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which are known to promote crop nutrition and health in agroecosystems. However, information on how mycorrhizal associations affect plant biotic interactions that occur aboveground with foliar herbivores is limited and needs to be further addressed for the development of pest management strategies. With the objective to examine the influence of maize mycorrhizas on foliar herbivory caused by larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda, a serious pest in maize agroecosystems, we performed a fully factorial greenhouse pot experiment with three factors: Maize genotype (Puma and Milpal H318), AMF (with and without AMF, and without AMF with mineral P) and Insect herbivory (with and without S. frugiperda). Main results showed that inoculation with AMF improved plant growth and foliar P concentration, which coincided with increased foliar damage from herbivory and higher biomass of S. frugiperda larvae. A significant positive correlation between shoot P concentration and larval biomass was also observed. Finally, foliar herbivory by S. frugiperda slightly increased and decreased AMF root colonization in Puma and H318, respectively. In conclusion, our results show that maize plant benefits from AMF in terms of promotion of growth and nutrition, and may also increase the damage caused from insects by improving the food quality of maize leaves for larval growth, which seems to be linked to increased P uptake by the maize mycorrhizal association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据