4.6 Article

Early-stage Parkinson's patients show selective impairment in reactive but not proactive inhibition

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 409-418

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27920

关键词

inhibitory control; lateralization; reaching arm movement; stop signal task; symptoms asymmetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It is well known that a deficit in inhibitory control is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, inhibition is not a unitary construct, and it is unclear whether patients in the early stage of the disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1) exhibit a deficit in outright stopping (reactive inhibition), a deficit in the ability to shape their response strategies according to the context (proactive inhibition), or both. Objective We assessed whether PD patients at Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 show a global or selective impairment in inhibitory control. As it has been suggested that inhibition relies upon a right-lateralized pathway, we tested whether left-dominant PD patients suffered from a more severe deficit in this executive function than right-dominant PD patients. Methods Via a reaching stop-signal task, we assessed both proactive and reactive inhibition in 17 left-dominant PD and 17 right-dominant PD patients and in 24 age-matched participants. Results We found that reactive inhibition was more impaired in PD patients than in healthy participants. However, proactive inhibition was not affected. Furthermore, we found no differences between left-dominant PD and right-dominant PD patients. Conclusions For the first time, we found evidence for a deficit of reactive inhibition in the early-stage PD patients in the absence of evidence for deficits in proactive inhibition. These findings have clinical relevance as they provide critical insights on the time course of the disease. In addition, we confirmed, on a population of PD patients at Hoehn and Yahr stage 1, previous results showing that the onset of the disease does not affect inhibition. (c) 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据