4.7 Article

A model for core formation in dark matter haloes and ultra-diffuse galaxies by outflow episodes

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3306

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: haloes; dark matter

资金

  1. FranceIsrael International Projects of Scientific Collaboration (PICS)
  2. Israeli Centers of for Research Excellence (I-CORE) Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee(PBC)/Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1829/12]
  3. U.S-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) [2014-273]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1405962]
  5. German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF) [I-1341-303.7/2016]
  6. Deutsch-Israelische Projektkooperation (DIP) [STE1869/2-1 GE625/17-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a simple model for the response of a dissipationless spherical system to an instantaneous mass change at its centre, describing the formation of flat cores in dark matter haloes and ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) from feedback-driven outflow episodes in a specific mass range. This model generalizes an earlier simplified analysis of an isolated shell into a system with continuous density, velocity, and potential profiles. The response is divided into an instantaneous change of potential at constant velocities due to a given mass-loss or massgain, followed by energy-conserving relaxation to a new Jeans equilibrium. The halo profile is modelled by a two-parameter function with a variable inner slope and an analytic potential profile, which enables determining the associated kinetic energy at equilibrium. The model is tested against NIHAO cosmological zoom-in simulations, where it successfully predicts the evolution of the inner dark matter profile between successive snapshots in about 75 per cent of the cases, failing mainly in merger situations. This model provides a simple understanding of the formation of dark matter halo cores and UDGs by supernova-driven outflows, and a useful analytic tool for studying such processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据