4.7 Article

The 21 cm bispectrum during reionization: a tracer of the ionization topology

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3139

关键词

methods: numerical; galaxies: high-redshift; intergalactic medium; dark ages, reionization, first stars

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC StG-717001]
  2. Australian Research Council's Discovery Project funding scheme [DP150102987]
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100013]
  4. European Research Council under ERC [638743-FIRSTDAWN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute the bispectra of the 21cm signal during the epoch of reionization for three different reionization scenarios that are based on a dark matter N-body simulation combined with a self-consistent, semi-numerical model of galaxy evolution and reionization. Our reionization scenarios differ in their trends of ionizing escape fractions (f(esc)) with the underlying galaxy properties and cover the physically plausible range, i.e. fesc effectively decreasing, being constant, or increasing with halo mass. We find the 21 cm bispectrum to be sensitive to the resulting ionization topologies that significantly differ in their size distribution of ionized and neutral regions throughout reionization. From squeezed to stretched triangles, the 21 cm bispectra features a change of sign from negative to positive values, with ionized and neutral regions representing below-average and above-average concentrations contributing negatively and positively, respectively. The position of the change of sign provides a tracer of the size distribution of the ionized and neutral regions, and allows us to identify three major regimes that the 21 cm bispectrum undergoes during reionization. In particular the regime during the early stages of reionization, where the 21 cm bispectrum tracks the peak of the size distribution of the ionized regions, provides exciting prospects for pinning down reionization with the forthcoming Square Kilometre Array.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据