4.7 Article

Signatures of an eccentric disc cavity: Dust and gas in IRS 48

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2770

关键词

hydrodynamics; methods: numerical; protoplanetary discs; circumstellar matter; stars: individual: Oph IRS 48

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. Australian Research Council [FT170100040, FT130100034, DP180104235]
  3. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientfico y Tecnologico [3170680]
  4. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientfica Tecnologica project Basal [AFB-170002]
  5. European Research Council under the European Union [681601]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [681601] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  7. Australian Research Council [FT170100040] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We test the hypothesis that the disc cavity in the 'transition disc' Oph IRS 48 is carved by an unseen binary companion. We use 3D dust-gas smoothed-particle hydrodynamics simulations to demonstrate that marginally coupled dust grains concentrate in the gas overdensity that forms in the cavity around a low binary mass ratio binary. This produces high contrast ratio dust asymmetries at the cavity edge similar to those observed in the disc around IRS 48 and other transition discs. This structure was previously assumed to be a vortex. However, we show that the observed velocity map of IRS 48 displays a peculiar asymmetry that is not predicted by the vortex hypothesis. We show the unusual kinematics are naturally explained by the non-Keplerian flow of gas in an eccentric circumbinary cavity. We further show that perturbations observed in the isovelocity curves of IRS 48 may be explained as the product of the dynamical interaction between the companion and the disc. The presence of an similar to 0.4 M-circle dot companion at an similar to 10 au separation can qualitatively explain these observations. High spatial resolution line and continuum imaging should be able to confirm this hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据